Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Contraception is typically considered safer than pregnancy, especially in patients with medical conditions such as high blood pressure or diabetes. However, people with medical conditions may need to have contraceptive options tailored around their specific needs. [1] Resources exist for patients and providers to help tailor methods.
Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) are methods of birth control that provide effective contraception for an extended period without requiring user action. They include hormonal and non-hormonal intrauterine devices (IUDs) and subdermal hormonal contraceptive implants.
Birth control, also known as contraception, anticonception, and fertility control, is the use of methods or devices to prevent pregnancy. [1] [2] Birth control has been used since ancient times, but effective and safe methods of birth control only became available in the 20th century. [3]
Effectiveness of contraceptive methods with respect to birth control. Only condoms are useful to prevent sexually transmitted infections. There are many methods of birth control (or contraception) that vary in requirements, side effects, and effectiveness. As the technology, education, and awareness about contraception has evolved, new ...
Hormonal contraception works primarily by preventing ovulation, but it may also thicken the cervical mucus inhibiting sperm penetration. [3] [4] [5] Hormonal contraceptives also have effects on the endometrium, [6] [7] that theoretically could affect implantation. [8] [9] [10] [11]
The effectiveness of other forms of birth control is mitigated (decreased) by the users themselves. If medication regimens for contraception are not followed precisely, the method becomes less effective. IUDs require no daily, weekly, or monthly regimen, so their typical use failure rate is therefore the same as their perfect use failure rate. [23]
When compared to other forms of contraception (combined oral contraceptives, contraceptive patch), the contraceptive vaginal ring showed similar, comparable efficacy and a better safety profile than its competitors. Oral contraceptive users experienced more adverse events of nausea and vomiting.
In 1940, one-third of all U.S. married couples used a diaphragm for contraception. The number of women using diaphragms dropped dramatically after the 1960s introduction of the intrauterine device and the combined oral contraceptive pill. In 1965, only 10% of U.S. married couples used a diaphragm for contraception. [48]