Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society , 457 U.S. 332 (1982), was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving antitrust law . A society of doctors in Maricopa County, Arizona , established maximum fees that their members could claim for seeing patients who were covered by certain health insurance plans.
The Constitution of Arizona provides the Superior Court with jurisdiction over: [1] concurrent jurisdiction over cases and proceedings in which exclusive jurisdiction is not vested by law in another court; equity cases that involve title to or possession of real property or the legality of any tax, assessment, toll or municipal ordinance;
Such citations and abbreviations are found in court decisions, statutes, regulations, journal articles, books, and other documents. Below is a basic list of very common abbreviations. Because publishers adopt different practices regarding how abbreviations are printed, one may find abbreviations with or without periods for each letter.
The United States District Court for the District of Arizona (in case citations, D. Ariz.) is the U.S. district court that covers the state of Arizona. It is under the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The District was established on June 20, 1910, pending Arizona statehood on February 14, 1912. [1]
State courts of Arizona. Arizona Supreme Court [1] Arizona Court of Appeals (2 divisions) [2] Superior Court of Arizona (15 counties) [2] Justices of the Peace (county courts) [3] and Arizona Municipal Courts, city trial courts and courts of limited jurisdiction; Federal courts located in Arizona. United States District Court for the District ...
Upgrade to a faster, more secure version of a supported browser. It's free and it only takes a few moments:
The United States District Court for the District of Arizona granted the Town's motion for summary judgment. [30] The church then appealed that ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, but the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court, holding the town's ordinance was content neutral. [30] Citing Hill v.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us