Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
From a Multiethnic Empire to a Nation of Nations: Austro-Hungarian Migrants in the US, 1870–1940 (Innsbruck: Studien Verlag, 2017). 354 pp. King, Jeremy (2024). "Who Is Who? National Classification in Imperial Austria, 1867–1914". The Journal of Modern History. 96 (2): 291–331.
Magyarization (UK: / ˌ m æ dʒ ər aɪ ˈ z eɪ ʃ ən / US: / ˌ m ɑː dʒ ər ɪ-/, also Hungarianization; Hungarian: magyarosítás [ˈmɒɟɒroʃiːtaːʃ]), after "Magyar"—the Hungarian autonym—was an assimilation or acculturation process by which non-Hungarian nationals living in the Kingdom of Hungary, then part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, adopted the Hungarian national ...
Usually, Austro-Hungarian migrant organizations in the US were mutual benefit societies and working class oriented, and many turned eventually into life insurance companies. Some were rather political, others initiated by interested parties in the so-called homeland (Austria-Hungary or one of its regions).
Timeline of Hungarian history; The following lists events that happened during 1910 in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Events. February February ...
Comparative demographics of Empire of Austria (red) and Kingdom of Hungary (green) in Europe before WW1 Ethnic and political situation in the Kingdom of Hungary according to the 1910 census 1910 census in Kingdom of Hungary The Danube River basin, with its tributaries the Tisza and Mures (Maros) shown Proportion of Hungarians in Hungary, 1890 census based on the most commonly spoken languages
English: Distribution of the German language among each crownland of Austria-Hungary, according to the 1910 Austro-Hungarian census. Deutsch: Verteilung der deutschen Sprache in den einzelnen Kronländern Österreich-Ungarns gemäß der österreichisch-ungarischen Volkszählung von 1910.
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Monday renamed the Army base Fort Liberty back to its original name of Fort Bragg, according to a Department of Defense statement, undoing a 2023 name change ...
Owen Johnson, an American historian, accepts the numbers of the earlier censuses up to the one in 1900, according to which the proportion of the Hungarians was 51.4%, [138] but he neglects the 1910 census as he thinks the changes since the last census are too big. [142]