enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: passages unique to luke 12 2

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Matthean Posteriority hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthean_Posteriority...

    Matthew contains passages that are conflations of elements drawn from Mark and Luke (e.g. Matt 9:14-17, 9:35-10,12:22-30, 12:31-32, 19:23-30, 24:23-28). This phenomenon is unique to Matthew, for there is no similar array of passages in Luke that are composed of elements drawn from Mark and Matthew.

  3. Luke 12 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luke_12

    Luke 12 is the 12th chapter of the Gospel of Luke in the New Testament of the Christian Bible. It records a number of teachings and parables told by Jesus Christ when "an innumerable multitude of people had gathered together", but addressed "first of all" to his disciples .

  4. Two-gospel hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-gospel_hypothesis

    Proponents of later dates of authorship (due to seeming familiarity with the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem in the First Jewish-Roman War in 70 AD in passages such as Mark 13) state that information unique to Matthew ("M") and Luke ("L") came from unknown sources. The two-gospel hypothesis, by placing the authorship of the gospels ...

  5. Synoptic Gospels - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synoptic_Gospels

    Matthew and Mark report the cursing of the fig tree, [12] [13] a single incident, despite some substantial differences of wording and content. In Luke, the only parable of the barren fig tree [14] is in a different point of the narrative. Some would say that Luke has extensively adapted an element of the triple tradition, while others would ...

  6. Marcan priority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcan_priority

    Mark's unique details tend to be, by necessity, non-essential ones. Marcan priority sees Matthew and Luke trimming away trivial narrative details in favor of the extensive material they wished to add elsewhere. But under Marcan posteriority, these details must have been added to Mark to make the stories more vivid and clear.

  7. Two-source hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-source_hypothesis

    In summary, the two-source hypothesis proposes that Matthew and Luke used Mark for its narrative material as well as for the basic structural outline of chronology of Jesus' life; and that Matthew and Luke use a second source, Q (from German Quelle, "source"), not extant, for the sayings (logia) found in both of them but not in Mark. [5]

  8. Q source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_source

    Some 198 instances involve one word, 82 involve two words, 35 three, 16 four, and 16 instances involve five or more words in the extant texts of Matthew and Luke as compared to Marcan passages. [42] John Wenham (1913–1996) adhered to the Augustinian hypothesis that Matthew was the first Gospel, Mark the second, and Luke the third, and ...

  9. List of New Testament pericopes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_Testament_peri...

    2 The Acts of the Apostles. 3 Epistle to the Galatians. 4 Revelation. 5 See also. Toggle the table of contents. List of New Testament pericopes. 1 language.

  1. Ad

    related to: passages unique to luke 12 2