enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: habeas corpus in the us code of procedure definition of ethics requires

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Habeas corpus in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_corpus_in_the...

    In United States law, habeas corpus (/ ˈ h eɪ b i ə s ˈ k ɔːr p ə s /) is a recourse challenging the reasons or conditions of a person's confinement under color of law.A petition for habeas corpus is filed with a court that has jurisdiction over the custodian, and if granted, a writ is issued directing the custodian to bring the confined person before the court for examination into ...

  3. Habeas corpus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_corpus

    Habeas corpus (/ ˈ h eɪ b i ə s ˈ k ɔːr p ə s / ⓘ; from Medieval Latin, lit. ' you should have the body ') [1] is an equitable remedy [2] by which a report can be made to a court alleging the unlawful detention or imprisonment of an individual, and requesting that the court order the individual's custodian (usually a prison official) to bring the prisoner to court, to determine ...

  4. Habeas Corpus Act of 1867 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_Corpus_Act_of_1867

    When the Habeas Corpus Act of 1867 is spoken of, it is usually this act that is meant. [1] [4] Another act dealing with habeas corpus was passed the same day and appears on the same page of the United States Statutes at Large, being the twenty-seventh rather than the twenty-eighth chapter

  5. Post conviction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_conviction

    While habeas corpus can be filed in state or federal court, all state avenues must be exhausted first. In the United States federal court system the writ of habeas corpus is used most frequently to review state court convictions. Federal statutes (28 U.S.C. §§ 2241–2256) outline the procedural aspects of federal habeas corpus proceedings. [10]

  6. Fay v. Noia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fay_v._Noia

    Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391 (1963), was a 1963 United States Supreme Court case concerning habeas corpus.In a majority opinion authored by Justice William J. Brennan, Jr., the Court held that state prisoners were entitled to access to habeas relief in federal court, even if they did not pursue a remedy in state court that was not available to them at the time.

  7. Supreme Court adopts code of conduct amid ethics scrutiny - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-says-formally...

    The Supreme Court on Monday announced it has adopted a new code of conduct, a move that comes after a series of allegations of ethics lapses.

  8. Category:United States habeas corpus case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States...

    This category is for articles about court cases that interpret the statutes and procedures that govern habeas corpus petitions in the United States.Cases in which habeas was merely the process by which the case reached the court, but which did not include a substantive discussion of habeas corpus itself, should not be included.

  9. Moral Injury: The Recruits - The ... - The Huffington Post

    projects.huffingtonpost.com/projects/moral...

    Drill instructors hammer into recruits a rigid moral code of honor, courage and commitment with the goal, according to the Marine Corps, of producing young Marines “thoroughly indoctrinated in love of Corps and Country … the epitome of personal character, selflessness, and military virtue.” The code is unyielding.

  1. Ad

    related to: habeas corpus in the us code of procedure definition of ethics requires