Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The lawsuit follows a State Department proposal to lower the required fee for renouncing U.S. citizenship.
The California Court of Appeals, Second Appellate District, affirmed this lower court ruling, emphasizing that congressional power was exclusive within the bounds of immigration and naturalization. [1] This ruling was again challenged, leading to the US Supreme Court granting a writ of certiorari.
The State Department eventually concluded that he had lost his US citizenship, [7] a decision which Terrazas appealed, first before the State Department's board of appellate review, [8] and subsequently to the courts. [9] Before the 1967 Supreme Court ruling in Afroyim v. Rusk, US law had provided for numerous ways for citizens to lose their ...
Under Department of Energy guidelines, an action that shows allegiance to a country other than the United States, such as a declaration of intent to renounce U.S. citizenship or actual renunciation of citizenship, demonstrates foreign preference and thus is a ground to deny a security clearance. [186]
Renouncing U.S. citizenship can reduce the administrative burden for Americans living abroad—at a cost. ... and pay the $2,350 fee (the State Department recently announced that will drop to $450 ...
A federal appeals court found Jolley to be removable, but Canada refused to re-admit Jolley as he was not a citizen and had lost his landed immigrant status there, and so he went on living in the U.S. as a stateless alien. [177] [178] He died in Asheville, North Carolina in 2014. [179] 1967: 1967: Too early Meir Kahane: Politician Jus soli: Israel
Tuaua v. United States is a court case, originally filed in 2012, [1] in which a group of American Samoans sued the State Department and the Obama administration.They sued to force the government to recognize American Samoans' birthright citizenship, arguing that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees that anyone born in the United States is automatically granted ...
A California appellate court has overturned the rape conviction of former San Francisco 49ers defensive tackle Dana Stubblefield – finding it “legally invalid” – on the grounds of racial bias.