Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In mathematics, the discriminant of a polynomial is a quantity ... and algebraic geometry. The discriminant of the ... of the above general definition of a discriminant.
In mathematics, the discriminant of an algebraic number field is a numerical invariant that, loosely speaking, measures the size of the (ring of integers of the) algebraic number field. More specifically, it is proportional to the squared volume of the fundamental domain of the ring of integers , and it regulates which primes are ramified .
It has the smallest discriminant of all totally real cubic fields, namely 49. [4] The field obtained by adjoining to Q a root of x 3 + x 2 − 3x − 1 is an example of a totally real cubic field that is not cyclic. Its discriminant is 148, the smallest discriminant of a non-cyclic totally real cubic field. [5]
For this converse the field discriminant is needed. This is the Dedekind discriminant theorem. In the example above, the discriminant of the number field () with x 3 − x − 1 = 0 is −23, and as we have seen the 23-adic place ramifies. The Dedekind discriminant tells us it is the only ultrametric place that does.
The discriminant of a quadratic form, concretely the class of the determinant of a representing matrix in K / (K ×) 2 (up to non-zero squares) can also be defined, and for a real quadratic form is a cruder invariant than signature, taking values of only "positive, zero, or negative".
In mathematics, the resultant of two polynomials is a polynomial expression of their coefficients that is equal to zero if and only if the polynomials have a common root (possibly in a field extension), or, equivalently, a common factor (over their field of coefficients).
Let D be the discriminant of the field, n be the degree of K over , and = be the number of complex embeddings where is the number of real embeddings.Then every class in the ideal class group of K contains an integral ideal of norm not exceeding Minkowski's bound
In this case, the definition amounts to t being a double root of F(t, x, y), so the equation of the envelope can be found by setting the discriminant of F to 0 (because the definition demands F=0 at some t and first derivative =0 i.e. its value 0 and it is min/max at that t).