Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Hearing: November 4, 2016 Judgment: June 23, 2017; Citations: 2017 SCC 33, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 751: Prior history: Judgement for Facebook Inc. in the British Columbia ...
In law, an argument from inconvenience or argumentum ab inconvenienti, is a valid type of appeal to consequences. Such an argument would seek to show that a proposed action would have unreasonably inconvenient consequences, as for example a law that would require a person wishing to lend money against a security to first ascertain the borrower ...
Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 (Aon v ANU) is a decision by the High Court of Australia (High Court). After a bushfire destroyed property and equipment at the Australian National University's (ANU) Mt Stromlo Campus in Canberra, the university lodged an insurance claim.
Forum non conveniens (Latin for "an inconvenient forum" [1] [2] [3]) (FNC) is a mostly common law legal doctrine through which a court acknowledges that another forum or court where the case might have been brought is a more appropriate venue for a legal case, and dismisses the case.
UPDATE — 10/10/24, 3:43 p.m. ET: Sean “Diddy” Combs must remain in prison ahead of his sex trafficking trial, Judge Arun Subramanian ruled on Thursday, October 10. The decision, confirmed by ...
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 is an English contract law decision by the Court of Appeal, which held an advertisement containing certain terms to get a reward constituted a binding unilateral offer that could be accepted by anyone who performed its terms.
Signed into law in 2011 by then-Gov. Scott Walker, Act 10 limited most public sector union contract negotiations to salaries only and capped those salary increases to the rate of inflation.
(The Center Square) – A Kenosha-area school teacher is asking to intervene in an Act 10 lawsuit in order to appeal a Dane County Circuit Court’s decision to overturn the law. Wisconsin ...