Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The function = {< has a limit at every non-zero x-coordinate (the limit equals 1 for negative x and equals 2 for positive x). The limit at x = 0 does not exist (the left-hand limit equals 1, whereas the right-hand limit equals 2).
A limit of a sequence of points () in a topological space is a special case of a limit of a function: the domain is in the space {+}, with the induced topology of the affinely extended real number system, the range is , and the function argument tends to +, which in this space is a limit point of .
On the other hand, if X is the domain of a function f(x) and if the limit as n approaches infinity of f(x n) is L for every arbitrary sequence of points {x n} in X − x 0 which converges to x 0, then the limit of the function f(x) as x approaches x 0 is equal to L. [10] One such sequence would be {x 0 + 1/n}.
In this case, a single limit does not exist because the one-sided limits, and + exist and are finite, but are not equal: since, +, the limit does not exist. Then, x 0 {\displaystyle x_{0}} is called a jump discontinuity , step discontinuity , or discontinuity of the first kind .
In case 2 the assumption that f(x) diverges to infinity was not used within the proof. This means that if |g(x)| diverges to infinity as x approaches c and both f and g satisfy the hypotheses of L'Hôpital's rule, then no additional assumption is needed about the limit of f(x): It could even be the case that the limit of f(x) does not exist. In ...
If () for all x in an interval that contains c, except possibly c itself, and the limit of () and () both exist at c, then [5] () If lim x → c f ( x ) = lim x → c h ( x ) = L {\displaystyle \lim _{x\to c}f(x)=\lim _{x\to c}h(x)=L} and f ( x ) ≤ g ( x ) ≤ h ( x ) {\displaystyle f(x)\leq g(x)\leq h(x)} for all x in an open interval that ...
Here, a is not required to lie in the interior of I. Indeed, if a is an endpoint of I, then the above limits are left- or right-hand limits. A similar statement holds for infinite intervals: for example, if I = (0, ∞), then the conclusion holds, taking the limits as x → ∞. This theorem is also valid for sequences.
In mathematical analysis, limit superior and limit inferior are important tools for studying sequences of real numbers.Since the supremum and infimum of an unbounded set of real numbers may not exist (the reals are not a complete lattice), it is convenient to consider sequences in the affinely extended real number system: we add the positive and negative infinities to the real line to give the ...