enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Ring size - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_size

   Ring sizes can be measured physically by a paper, plastic, or metal ring sizer (as a gauge) or by measuring the inner diameter of a ring that already fits. Ring sticks are tools used to measure the inner size of a ring, and are typically made from plastic, delrin, wood, aluminium, or of multiple materials. Digital ring sticks can be used for ...

3. Digit ratio - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digit_ratio

   Hand with index finger being shorter than the ring finger, resulting in a small 2D:4D ratio. Image shows the measurement procedure of dorsal digit length using vernier calipers. The hand is placed on the edge of a table so that fingers are rested on table while making an angle of 90 degrees to the palm.

4. Ring (jewellery) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_(jewellery)

   Ruby ring. A ring is a round band, usually made of metal, worn as ornamental jewelry.The term "ring" by itself denotes jewellery worn on the finger; when worn as an ornament elsewhere, the body part is specified within the term, e.g., earrings, neck rings, arm rings, and toe rings.

5. AOL Mail

   mail.aol.com

   Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

6. Boxing ring - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boxing_ring

   The name "ring" is a relic from when contests were fought in a roughly drawn circle on the ground. The name ring continued with the London Prize Ring Rules in 1743, which specified a small circle in the centre of the fight area where the boxers met at the start of each round. The first square ring was introduced by the Pugilistic Society in 1838.

7. Talk:Ring size - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ring_size

   However, I've seen many sites claim that a US size 0 is 11.53mm, not 11.63. I've seen other pages that list it as ring_diameter = 11.54 + 0.83 * ring size, which more closely agrees with the size 0 number. On the other hand, a linear regression of this chart results in 11.634 + .8136 x ring_size. It's all over the place, and the charts don't ...