Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
It is the algebra of the set-theoretic operations of union, intersection and complementation, and the relations of equality and inclusion. For a basic introduction to sets see the article on sets, for a fuller account see naive set theory, and for a full rigorous axiomatic treatment see axiomatic set theory.
The combined region of the two sets is called their union, denoted by A ∪ B, where A is the orange circle and B the blue. The union in this case contains all living creatures that either are two-legged or can fly (or both). The region included in both A and B, where the two sets overlap, is called the intersection of A and B, denoted by A ∩ B.
For example, the union of three sets A, B, and C contains all elements of A, all elements of B, and all elements of C, and nothing else. Thus, x is an element of A ∪ B ∪ C if and only if x is in at least one of A, B, and C. A finite union is the union of a finite number of sets; the phrase does not imply that the union set is a finite set ...
An example of how intersecting sets define a graph. In graph theory, an intersection graph is a graph that represents the pattern of intersections of a family of sets.Any graph can be represented as an intersection graph, but some important special classes of graphs can be defined by the types of sets that are used to form an intersection representation of them.
This article lists mathematical properties and laws of sets, involving the set-theoretic operations of union, intersection, and complementation and the relations of set equality and set inclusion. It also provides systematic procedures for evaluating expressions, and performing calculations, involving these operations and relations.
Union [e] If R and S are relations over X then R ∪ S = { (x, y) | xRy or xSy} is the union relation of R and S. The identity element of this operation is the empty relation. For example, ≤ is the union of < and =, and ≥ is the union of > and =. Intersection [e] If R and S are relations over X then R ∩ S = { (x, y) | xRy and xSy} is the ...
So the intersection of the empty family should be the universal set (the identity element for the operation of intersection), [4] but in standard set theory, the universal set does not exist. However, when restricted to the context of subsets of a given fixed set X {\displaystyle X} , the notion of the intersection of an empty collection of ...
Set-theoretic union and intersection are dual under the set complement operator ∁. That is, A ∁ ∩ B ∁ = (A ∪ B) ∁, and more generally, ⋂ A α ∁ = (⋃ A α) ∁. This follows from the duality of ∀ and ∃: an element x is a member of ⋂ A α ∁ if and only if ∀α.¬x ∈ A α, and is a member of (⋂ A α) ∁ if and only ...