enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Inversion (linguistics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inversion_(linguistics)

    is arrivato arrived Giovanni. Giovanni è arrivato Giovanni. is arrived Giovanni 'Giovanni arrived' In English, on the other hand, subject-verb inversion generally takes the form of a Locative inversion. A familiar example of subject-verb inversion from English is the presentational there construction. There's a shark. English (especially written English) also has an inversion construction ...

  3. Subject–auxiliary inversion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subject–auxiliary_inversion

    When the movement rule applies, it moves the auxiliary to the beginning of the sentence. [5] An alternative analysis does not acknowledge the binary division of the clause into subject NP and predicate VP, but rather it places the finite verb as the root of the entire sentence and views the subject as switching to the other side of the finite verb.

  4. Subject–verb inversion in English - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subject–verb_inversion_in...

    Such sentences are more consistent with a theory that takes sentence structure to be relatively flat, lacking a finite verb phrase constituent, i.e. lacking the VP of S → NP VP. In order to maintain the traditional subject–predicate division, one has to assume movement (or copying) on a massive scale. The basic difficulty is suggested by ...

  5. Immediate constituent analysis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immediate_constituent_analysis

    In linguistics, Immediate Constituent Analysis (ICA) is a syntactic theory which focuses on the hierarchical structure of sentences by isolating and identifying the constituents. While the idea of breaking down sentences into smaller components can be traced back to early psychological and linguistic theories, ICA as a formal method was ...

  6. English grammar - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_grammar

    The Sentence in Written English: A Syntactic Study Based on an Analysis of Scientific Texts. Cambridge University Press. p. 352. ISBN 978-0-521-11395-3. Jespersen, Otto (1982). Growth and Structure of the English Language. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. p. 244. ISBN 0-226-39877-3. Jespersen, Otto (1992). Philosophy of Grammar.

  7. Syntactic parsing (computational linguistics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntactic_parsing...

    Given that much work on English syntactic parsing depended on the Penn Treebank, which used a constituency formalism, many works on dependency parsing developed ways to deterministically convert the Penn formalism to a dependency syntax, in order to use it as training data. One of the major conversion algorithms was Penn2Malt, which ...

  8. Text linguistics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_linguistics

    Text linguistics is a branch of linguistics that deals with texts as communication systems.Its original aims lay in uncovering and describing text grammars.The application of text linguistics has, however, evolved from this approach to a point in which text is viewed in much broader terms that go beyond a mere extension of traditional grammar towards an entire text.

  9. Syntactic Structures - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntactic_Structures

    It used symbols and rules that did not refer to meaning. [21] From there on, Chomsky tried to build a grammar of Hebrew. Such a grammar would generate the phonetic or sound forms of sentences. To this end, he organized Harris's methods in a different way. [note 18] To describe sentence forms and structures, he came up with a set of recursive ...