enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia and fact-checking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_and_fact-checking

    Wikipedia is considered one of the major free open source websites, where millions can read, edit and post their views for free. Therefore Wikipedia takes the effort to provide its readers with well-verified sources. Meticulous fact-checking is an aspect of the broader reliability of Wikipedia.

  3. Wikipedia : Verifiability, not truth

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability...

    Consequently, some judgment and comparison of sources is needed in order to identify reliable sources. Reliable sources respect truth; a source that is commonly untruthful is not reliable. A source may be partly or more or less reliable. Concurrence of possibly reliable sources may help in identifying reliable sources, and editors should seek it.

  4. Fact-checking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact-checking

    Highly credible sources are the most effective, especially those which surprisingly report facts against their own perceived bias; Reframing the issue by adding context can be more effective than simply labeling it as incorrect or unproven. Challenging readers' identity or worldview reduces effectiveness.

  5. Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and...

    Wikipedia does not use these terms exactly like academics use them. There are at least two ways in which the term secondary source is used on Wikipedia. This page deals primarily with the classification of reliable sources in terms of article content. The classification used specifically for notability is addressed in a separate section at the end.

  6. Wikipedia:Verifiability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

    [g] Exercise caution when using such sources: if the information in question is suitable for inclusion, someone else will probably have published it in independent, reliable sources. [1] Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer.

  7. List of fact-checking websites - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fact-checking_websites

    One of their objectives is integrating young people into factchecking to help curb the spread of information disorder. [ 19 ] In 2022, the organisation began a bi-annual volunteering network aimed at training young fact-checkers in Africa and mentoring them to publish their contents for a period of four months after which they are inducted as ...

  8. Wikipedia:Wikipedia as a Citable Source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_as_a...

    Research papers, particularly the one research paper students write in their eleventh grade, have always been an integral part of high school education [4].They stress the need to verify information and teach students how to evaluate sources critically, and as a result, teachers have developed various criteria to help students identify credible sources, an especially important skill in the ...

  9. Wikipedia:How to increase Wikipedia's credibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:How_to_increase...

    This page in a nutshell: Wikipedia gains credibility by being Anti-Fringe, factual, calling things by their right names, and confidently opposing Pro-Fringe editors.A dominance of Anti-Fringe editors causes Pro-Fringe editors to be less successful, leave the project, and their loss is a benefit to the project and directly boosts its credibility.

  1. Related searches is infoplease a credible source for evidence making people think called

    wikipedia reliable sourceswikipedia self published source identification
    what is a reliable source