Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The National Reading Panel (NRP) was a United States government body.Formed in 1997 at the request of Congress, it was a national panel with the stated aim of assessing the effectiveness of different approaches used to teach children to read.
This United States Congress image is in the public domain.This may be because it was taken by an employee of the Congress as part of that person’s official duties, or because it has been released into the public domain and posted on the official websites of a member of Congress.
National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children.
Ehri served on the National Reading Panel, commissioned by the U.S. Congress to report on research-based methods of effective reading instruction from 1997 to 2000. [1] As a member of the panel, she chaired the alphabetics subgroup. [ 8 ]
[38] [39] [40] The National Reading Panel identified positive effects only for a subset, particularly summarizing, asking questions, answering questions, comprehension monitoring, graphic organizers, and cooperative learning. The Panel also emphasized that a combination of strategies, as used in Reciprocal Teaching, can be effective. [33]
The National Reading Panel has found that phonemic awareness improves children's word reading and reading comprehension and helps children learn to spell. [1] Phonemic awareness is the basis for learning phonics. [2] Phonemic awareness and phonological awareness are often confused since they are interdependent.
1995–1999, Chair, department of reading, and senior research scientist at National Research Center for English Learning and Achievement University at Albany, SUNY; 1989–1999, Professor, teaching and research, University at Albany, SUNY; 1987–1989, Director, Center for Teaching Effectiveness, State University of New York at Albany,
The National Reading Panel in the United States concluded that systematic phonics instruction is more effective than unsystematic phonics or non-phonics instruction. [17] Some critics suggest that systematic phonics is "skill and drill" with little attention to meaning. However, researchers point out that this impression is false.