Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The violent crime rate of 2,057 per 100,000 was the second highest in the nation after St. Louis. It was roughly ten times the average rate of the suburban counties of metro Detroit which had violent crime rates below the national average of 394 per 100,000.
The following table of United States cities by crime rate is based on Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) statistics from 2019 for the 100 most populous cities in America that have reported data to the FBI UCR system. [1] The population numbers are based on U.S. Census estimates for the year end.
City, county and state officials released crime statistics during a press conference Monday at Wayne County’s office in downtown Detroit. They said from Jan. 1 through Nov. 30 there were 228 ...
In 2019, 43,686 crimes were reported in the U.S. state of Michigan.Crime statistics vary widely by location. For example, Dearborn has a murder rate of only 2.1 per 100,000 while sharing borders with Detroit (43.5 per 100,000) and Inkster (24.2 per 100,000), some of the highest rates in the state.
At the other end of the list, Birmingham, Alabama, ranks as the city with the highest crime cost per capita in the U.S. at $11,392, coupled with a high violent crime rate of 1,682 per 100,000 ...
List of countries by suicide rate; List of federal subjects of Russia by murder rate; List of Mexican states by homicides; List of U.S. states by homicide rate; List of United States cities by crime rate (2014) Number of guns per capita by country; Right to keep and bear arms in the United States; United States cities by crime rate (100,000 ...
Detroit brought home the bacon despite 2.5 percent reduction in violent crimes since last year because 45 out of every 100,000 people are murdered and 2,072 (per 100,000) are victims of violent ...
Crime rates per capita might also be biased by population size depending on the crime type. [6] This misrepresentation occurs because rates per capita assume that crime increases at the same pace as the number of people in an area. [7] When this linear assumption does not hold, rates per capita still have population effects.