enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Electronic Registration Information Center - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Registration...

    ERIC member states and withdrawn states as of July 2024 [5]. The Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) is a nonprofit organization in the United States whose goal is to improve electoral integrity by helping states improve the accuracy of voter rolls, increase access to voter registration, reduce election costs, and increase efficiencies in elections.

  3. List of jurisdictions subject to the special provisions of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_jurisdictions...

    The coverage formula, contained in Section 4(b) of the Act, determines which states are subject to preclearance. As enacted in 1965, the first element in the formula was whether, on November 1, 1964, the state or a political subdivision of the state maintained a "test or device" restricting the opportunity to register and vote.

  4. State Voting Rights Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Voting_Rights_Act

    The federal Voting Rights Act (VRA) of 1965 was a critical tool in addressing racial discrimination in voting, particularly in southern states. Its most potent provision was the preclearance requirement under Section 5, which mandated that certain jurisdictions with histories of discrimination obtain federal approval before changing voting laws ...

  5. Documents show Republican-led states struggling to clean ...

    www.aol.com/documents-show-republican-led-states...

    Taylor, who no longer works for the secretary of state, told Votebeat in a text message that, while ERIC was the best tool states had for cross-state voter roll cleanup, the program became less ...

  6. States move to shore up voting rights protections after ...

    www.aol.com/news/states-move-shore-voting-rights...

    The biggest blow to the federal law in the view of voting rights advocates was a 2013 Supreme Court ruling in an Alabama case that stripped the government of a potent tool to stop voting bias by ...

  7. Shelby County v. Holder - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_County_v._Holder

    Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), is a landmark decision [1] of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and subsection (b) of Section 4 ...

  8. States move to shore up voting rights protections after ...

    www.aol.com/states-move-shore-voting-rights...

    The biggest blow to the federal law in the view of voting rights advocates was a 2013 Supreme Court ruling in an Alabama case that stripped the government of a potent tool to stop voting bias by ...

  9. Voter ID and absentee-ballot limits: South tightens key ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/voter-id-absentee-ballot-limits...

    And the new laws may alter the outcome of the 2024 election by lowering voting among Black Americans, who overwhelmingly choose Democrats. Since 2020, states have tightened who can vote absentee ...