Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This asymptotic formula was first obtained by G. H. Hardy and Ramanujan in 1918 and independently by J. V. Uspensky in 1920. Considering p ( 1000 ) {\displaystyle p(1000)} , the asymptotic formula gives about 2.4402 × 10 31 {\displaystyle 2.4402\times 10^{31}} , reasonably close to the exact answer given above (1.415% larger than the true value).
The initial idea is usually attributed to the work of Hardy with Srinivasa Ramanujan a few years earlier, in 1916 and 1917, on the asymptotics of the partition function.It was taken up by many other researchers, including Harold Davenport and I. M. Vinogradov, who modified the formulation slightly (moving from complex analysis to exponential sums), without changing the broad lines.
It is seen to have dimension 0 only in the cases where ℓ = 5, 7 or 11 and since the partition function can be written as a linear combination of these functions [4] this can be considered a formalization and proof of Ramanujan's observation.
Let n be a non-negative integer and let p(n) denote the number of partitions of n (p(0) is defined to be 1).Srinivasa Ramanujan in a paper [3] published in 1918 stated and proved the following congruences for the partition function p(n), since known as Ramanujan congruences.
[3] [4] [5] Hardy & Wright include in their definition the requirement that an arithmetical function "expresses some arithmetical property of n". [6] There is a larger class of number-theoretic functions that do not fit this definition, for example, the prime-counting functions. This article provides links to functions of both classes.
Among the 22 partitions of the number 8, there are 6 that contain only odd parts: 7 + 1; 5 + 3; 5 + 1 + 1 + 1; 3 + 3 + 1 + 1; 3 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1; 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1; Alternatively, we could count partitions in which no number occurs more than once. Such a partition is called a partition with distinct parts. If we count the ...
In mathematics, the Hardy–Ramanujan theorem, proved by Ramanujan and checked by Hardy [1] states that the normal order of the number () of distinct prime factors of a number is . Roughly speaking, this means that most numbers have about this number of distinct prime factors.
More formulas of this nature can be given, as explained by Ramanujan's theory of elliptic functions to alternative bases. Perhaps the most notable hypergeometric inversions are the following two examples, involving the Ramanujan tau function τ {\displaystyle \tau } and the Fourier coefficients j {\displaystyle \mathrm {j} } of the J-invariant ...