enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Vagueness doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagueness_doctrine

    The court determined that the residual clause was unconstitutionally vague because of the combination of two factors: (1) it focused on the ordinary case of a felony, rather than statutory elements or the nature of the convicted's actions, leaving significant uncertainty about how to assess the risk posed by a crime; and (2) the clause does not ...

  3. Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoffman_Estates_v._The...

    Municipal ordinance imposing licensing and other requirements on sale of drug paraphernalia was not facially an overbroad restriction on speech as overbreadth doctrine does not apply to commercial speech; facial challenge as vague fails where plaintiff cannot demonstrate law was impermissibly vague in all its applications, and as economic ...

  4. Buckley v. Valeo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckley_v._Valeo

    Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on campaign finance.A majority of justices held that, as provided by section 608 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, limits on election expenditures are unconstitutional.

  5. Comstock Act of 1873 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comstock_Act_of_1873

    The broad language used in the Comstock Act has, mostly in the years since the Dobbs decision, lead to some opining that the Comstock Act, particularly 18 U.S.C. § 1461, is unconstitutionally vague. [44] [57] However, the understanding built by the surrounding case law has been largely dismissive of vagueness challenges. For instance, in ...

  6. FCC indecency rule called 'unconstitutionally vague' - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2010-07-14-fcc-indecency-rule...

    A federal appeals court has stuck down the Federal Communications Commission's policy on indecent content, saying it "violates the First Amendment because it is unconstitutionally vague." The ...

  7. Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevada_Commission_on...

    Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan, 564 U.S. 117 (2011), was a Supreme Court of the United States decision in which the court held that the Nevada Ethics in Government Law, which required government officials recuse in cases involving a conflict of interest, is not unconstitutionally overbroad. Specifically, the law requires government ...

  8. New York appeals court rules ethics watchdog that pursued ...

    www.aol.com/news/york-appeals-court-rules-ethics...

    A state commission that investigates ethical violations in New York was created unconstitutionally, an appeals court said Thursday in a ruling in favor of former Gov. Andrew Cuomo that targets the ...

  9. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    It is not vague or overbroad, and it does not impose an undue burden on a woman's right to choose to have an abortion. Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. 582 (2016) Clarified the undue burden standard which was developed in a case from 1983 and applied in the 1992 case Planned Parenthood v. Casey. (Overruled by Dobbs v.

  1. Related searches unconstitutionally vague and overbroad are known as economic issues that occur

    what is unconstitutional vaguenessvagueness in the constitution
    vague constitutional law