Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" is a 2005 essay written by John Ioannidis, a professor at the Stanford School of Medicine, and published in PLOS Medicine. [1] It is considered foundational to the field of metascience .
Ioannidis (2005): "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False".[1]The replication crisis [a] is an ongoing methodological crisis in which the results of many scientific studies are difficult or impossible to reproduce.
John Ioannidis (2005), "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" [15] Ioannidis's 2005 paper " Why Most Published Research Findings Are False " [ 2 ] is the most downloaded paper in the Public Library of Science .
You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work; to remix – to adapt the work; Under the following conditions: attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
In published academic research, publication bias occurs when the outcome of an experiment or research study biases the decision to publish or otherwise distribute it. Publishing only results that show a significant finding disturbs the balance of findings in favor of positive results. [1]
In the most basic sense, there are four possible outcomes for a COVID-19 test, whether it’s molecular PCR or rapid antigen: true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative.
The researchers tried to find simple causes for the phenomenon, such as people not looking directly at the detail in question when observing the character or images across the internet displaying ...
In 2005, John Ioannidis published a paper titled "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False", which argued that a majority of papers in the medical field produce conclusions that are wrong. [6] The paper went on to become the most downloaded paper in the Public Library of Science [ 9 ] [ 10 ] and is considered foundational to the field of ...