enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Non-obviousness in United States patent law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-obviousness_in_United...

    "Obvious to try" – choosing from a finite number of identified, predictable solutions, with a reasonable expectation of success; Known work in one field of endeavor may prompt variations of it for use in either the same field or a different one based on design incentives or other market forces if the variations are predictable to one of ...

  3. Manual of Patent Examining Procedure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manual_of_Patent_Examining...

    The MPEP is available in both PDF and HTML versions. [2] The current version of the MPEP is the 9th Edition, which was released in March 2014. The MPEP has traditionally been available in paper form , but electronic versions are now used more often, particularly because an applicant only may consult the electronic versions while taking the ...

  4. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KSR_International_Co._v...

    On April 30, 2007, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the judgment of the Federal Circuit, holding that the disputed claim 4 of the patent was obvious under the requirements of 35 U.S.C. §103, and that in "rejecting the District Court’s rulings, the Court of Appeals analyzed the issue in a narrow, rigid manner inconsistent with §103 and our precedents," referring to the Federal Circuit ...

  5. Patent infringement under United States law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_infringement_under...

    However, pre-grant protection is available under 35 U.S.C. § 154(d), which allows a patent owner to obtain reasonable royalty damages for certain infringing activities that occurred before patent's date of issuance. This right to obtain provisional damages requires a patent holder to show that (1) the infringing activities occurred after the ...

  6. Inventive step and non-obviousness - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inventive_step_and_non...

    The purpose of the inventive step, or non-obviousness, requirement is to avoid granting patents for inventions which only follow from "normal product design and development", to achieve a proper balance between the incentive provided by the patent system, namely encouraging innovation, and its social cost, namely conferring temporary monopolies. [4]

  7. Reexamination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reexamination

    A request for a reexamination can be filed by anyone at any time during the period of enforceability of a patent. To request a reexamination, one must submit a "request for reexamination" which includes (1) a statement pointing out each "substantial new question of patentability based on prior patents and printed publications; (2) an identification and explanation for every claim for which ...

  8. Petition to make special - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petition_to_make_special

    Petitions to make special are particularly important for timely examination of business method patents.Projected delays in examination of business method patents range from 4 to 14 years. [6]

  9. Reduction to practice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduction_to_practice

    In United States patent law, the reduction to practice is the step in the formation of an invention beyond the conception thereof. Reduction to practice may be either actual (the invention is actually carried out and is found to work for its intended purpose) or constructive (a patent application having a sufficient disclosure is filed).