Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The three electors then appealed to the Washington Supreme Court, which in May 2019 upheld the lower court ruling with an 8–1 vote. The majority opinion states that "The power of electors to vote comes from the State, and the elector has no personal right to that vote" to justify the fine.
On June 7, 2018, the Supreme Court declared the state had fully covered the funding of basic education, lifting the contempt order and $100,000 a day fine, ending any judicial oversight of the case. [10] [11] In the McCleary ruling, the Supreme Court cited teacher pay as a primary issue with the failure of the state to fund public education. [12]
The Washington Supreme Court is the highest court in the judiciary of the U.S. state of Washington. The court is composed of a chief justice and eight associate justices. Members of the court are elected to six-year terms. Justices must retire at the end of the calendar year in which they reach the age of 75, per the Washington State ...
The Washington Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Oregon State and Washington State in their fight for control of the Pac-12. The court said Friday that it was lifting a stay that it implemented ...
Though there were some surprises, conservatives scored major victories at the Supreme Court WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court just The post The Supreme Court just issued its biggest rulings of ...
Spokane, in eastern Washington, is the state’s second most populous city with roughly 230,000 residents. ... Before the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, western cities had been allowed to regulate ...
The Washington Supreme Court is the state supreme court of Washington. It is the highest court in the state and is based in the Temple of Justice at the Washington State Capitol campus in the state capital of Olympia. Almost all the cases that the Court hears are appeals from the decisions of the Washington Court of Appeals.
Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Association, 443 U.S. 658 (1979), was a United States Supreme Court case related to Indian fishing rights in Washington State. It held that the usual and accustomed clause of the Stevens Treaties protected Indians ' share of anadromous fish in addition to protecting fishing grounds.