Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Strong duality is a condition in mathematical optimization in which the primal optimal objective and the dual optimal objective are equal. By definition, strong duality holds if and only if the duality gap is equal to 0.
In mathematics, a duality translates concepts, theorems or mathematical structures into other concepts, theorems or structures in a one-to-one fashion, often (but not always) by means of an involution operation: if the dual of A is B, then the dual of B is A.
The duality gap is zero if and only if strong duality holds. Otherwise the gap is strictly positive and weak duality holds. [5] In computational optimization, another "duality gap" is often reported, which is the difference in value between any dual solution and the value of a feasible but suboptimal iterate for the primal problem.
The max-flow min-cut theorem is a special case of the strong duality theorem: flow-maximization is the primal LP, and cut-minimization is the dual LP. See Max-flow min-cut theorem#Linear program formulation. Other graph-related theorems can be proved using the strong duality theorem, in particular, Konig's theorem. [9]
In mathematics, a duality, generally speaking, translates concepts, theorems or mathematical structures into other concepts, theorems or structures, in a one-to-one fashion, often (but not always) by means of an involution operation: if the dual of A is B, then the dual of B is A.
Theorem — (sufficiency) If there exists a solution to the primal problem, a solution (,) to the dual problem, such that together they satisfy the KKT conditions, then the problem pair has strong duality, and , (,) is a solution pair to the primal and dual problems.
In mathematics, Slater's condition (or Slater condition) is a sufficient condition for strong duality to hold for a convex optimization problem, named after Morton L. Slater. [1] Informally, Slater's condition states that the feasible region must have an interior point (see technical details below).
This allows the definition of a functor from the category of left R-modules to the category of left M n (R)-modules. The inverse functor is defined by realizing that for any M n (R)-module there is a left R-module X such that the M n (R)-module is obtained from X as described above.