Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Walmart has denied any wrongdoing — but agreed to pay $45 million to settle the litigation. That means that impacted consumers can now submit claims for cash payments.
Walmart settlement: Who is eligible to submit a claim? If you bought weighted goods or bagged citrus in person at a Walmart in the U.S. or Puerto Rico between Oct. 18, 2018, through Jan. 19, 2024 ...
Walmart has agreed to a $45 million class-action lawsuit settlement that may lead to you getting some money. The lawsuit, Kurkorinis vs. Walmart, alleged that people who purchased certain sold-by ...
The payment card interchange fee and merchant discount antitrust litigation is a United States class-action lawsuit filed in 2005 by merchants and trade associations against Visa, Mastercard, and numerous financial institutions that issue payment cards. The suit was filed because of price fixing and other allegedly anti-competitive trade ...
Walmart Inc. v. DEA-DOJ was a settlement involving the complaints and lawsuits of Walmart pharmacy, and other large pharmaceutical companies. The lawsuits were made after an official complaint issued by the United States Department of Justice and the Drug Enforcement Administration, after Walmart was accused of illicitly selling opioids to their customers.
Wal-Mart v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a group of roughly 1.5 million women could not be certified as a valid class of plaintiffs in a class-action lawsuit for employment discrimination against Walmart. Lead plaintiff Betty Dukes, a Walmart employee, and others alleged gender ...
Walmart has agreed to pay $45 million to customers as part of a class-action lawsuit settlement, and customers could be eligible to up to $500 each.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 230 F.3d 868 (6th Cir. 2000), [1] was a case decided by the 6th Circuit that held that remand to a state court cannot be achieved after removal to a federal court by lowering the damages sought to fall below the amount in controversy requirement. [2]