Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
"A best response to a coplayer’s strategy is a strategy that yields the highest payoff against that particular strategy". [9] A matrix is used to present the payoff of both players in the game. For example, the best response of player one is the highest payoff for player one’s move, and vice versa.
Risk dominance and payoff dominance are two related refinements of the Nash equilibrium (NE) solution concept in game theory, defined by John Harsanyi and Reinhard Selten.A Nash equilibrium is considered payoff dominant if it is Pareto superior to all other Nash equilibria in the game. 1 When faced with a choice among equilibria, all players would agree on the payoff dominant equilibrium since ...
In this solution concept, players are assumed to be rational and so strictly dominated strategies are eliminated from the set of strategies that might feasibly be played. A strategy is strictly dominated when there is some other strategy available to the player that always has a higher payoff, regardless of the strategies that the other players choose.
A payoff function for a player is a mapping from the cross-product of players' strategy spaces to that player's set of payoffs (normally the set of real numbers, where the number represents a cardinal or ordinal utility—often cardinal in the normal-form representation) of a player, i.e. the payoff function of a player takes as its input a ...
The expected payoff for playing strategy 1 / 2 Y + 1 / 2 Z must be greater than the expected payoff for playing pure strategy X, assigning 1 / 2 and 1 / 2 as tester values. The argument for mixed strategy dominance can be made if there is at least one mixed strategy that allows for dominance.
On the other hand, weakly dominated strategies may be part of Nash equilibria. For instance, consider the payoff matrix pictured at the right. Strategy C weakly dominates strategy D. Consider playing C: If one's opponent plays C, one gets 1; if one's opponent plays D, one gets 0. Compare this to D, where one gets 0 regardless.
Starting loan balance. Monthly payment. Paid toward principal. Paid toward interest. New loan balance. Month 1. $20,000. $387. $287. $100. $19,713. Month 2. $19,713. $387
The rule goes as follows: if the first payoff number, in the payoff pair of the cell, is the maximum of the column of the cell and if the second number is the maximum of the row of the cell - then the cell represents a Nash equilibrium.