enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Near v. Minnesota - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_v._Minnesota

    Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court under which prior restraint on publication was found to violate freedom of the press as protected under the First Amendment.

  3. Social Media Age Verification Laws In The United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Media_Age...

    Status of Social Media Age Verification laws in the United States. In 2022 California passed The California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act or AB 2273 which requires websites that are likely to be used by minors to estimate visitors ages to give them some amount of privacy control and on March 23, 2023, Utah Governor Spencer Cox signed SB 152 and HB 311 collective known as the Utah Social ...

  4. Michael Howard (American politician) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Howard_(American...

    Michael 'Mike' Howard (born February 17, 1983) is an American politician serving in the Minnesota House of Representatives since 2019. A member of the Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party (DFL), Howard represents District 51A in the south-central Twin Cities metropolitan area, which includes the city of Richfield and parts of Minneapolis in Hennepin County.

  5. Bryan v. Itasca County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bryan_v._Itasca_County

    Bryan v. Itasca County, 426 U.S. 373 (1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a state did not have the right to assess a tax on the property of a Native American (Indian) living on tribal land absent a specific Congressional grant of authority to do so.

  6. Refusing to assist a police officer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refusing_to_assist_a...

    He would summon assistance from locals to enforce the King's laws or to apprehend an offender. [1] It subsequently became part of the common law that all persons must assist a constable or peace officer when so requested. This still remains as one of the few common law offences which exist in England/Wales and some other states/countries.

  7. Similarly, a pro se litigant may not act as a class representative in a class action lawsuit [20] and therefore a pro se litigant may not bring a class action. [20] Furthermore, a non-attorney parent may not appear on behalf of his or her child, except to appeal the denial of social security benefits to such child. [20]

  8. Breed-specific legislation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breed-specific_legislation

    Pit bull–type dog wearing a muzzle. In law, breed-specific legislation (BSL) is a type of law that prohibits or restricts particular breeds or types of dog. [1] Such laws range from outright bans on the possession of these dogs, to restrictions and conditions on ownership, and often establishes a legal presumption that such dogs are dangerous or vicious to prevent dog attacks.