Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Packingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. 98 (2017), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a North Carolina statute that prohibited registered sex offenders from using social media websites was unconstitutional because it violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects freedom of speech.
Text of Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213 (1967) is available from: CourtListener Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio) State v. Klopfer 145 S.E.2d 909 (1966)-North Carolina Supreme Court opinion (South Eastern Reporter, second series) 266 N.C. 349-North Carolina Supreme Court court opinion (North Carolina Reporter)
[9] The "sliding scale" or "Zippo" test has been generally accepted as the standard in federal courts in deciding personal jurisdiction in Internet cases. [1] Such cases are now primarily decided based on a determination of the website's "interactivity". Courts have held that the greater the commercial nature and level of interactivity ...
The Hutelmyer case. In 1997, a jury in Alamance County awarded $1 million to Dorothy Hutelmyer, who argued in court that a secretary in her husband’s insurance office had intentionally wooed him ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina is the state of North Carolina's highest appellate court. Until the creation of the North Carolina Court of Appeals in the 1960s, it was the state's only appellate court. The Supreme Court consists of six associate justices and one chief justice, although the number of justices has varied.
Charles Bailey, holding up a photo of himself when he was abused by a Catholic priest at 10-years-old, attended a North Carolina Supreme Court hearing on Wednesday, Sept. 18, 2024.
New "District Courts" were proposed to succeed the recorder's courts and justice of the peace courts as standard local trial courts. [6] [7] Through the late 1950s and 1960s, North Carolina's judicial system was overhauled by legislation and constitutional amendment. [4] [5] District Courts were phased-in beginning in December 1966 in 23 ...