enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Jackson v. Indiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_v._Indiana

    Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that determined a U.S. state violated due process by involuntarily committing a criminal defendant for an indefinite period of time solely on the basis of his permanent incompetency to stand trial on the charges filed against him.

  3. List of court cases involving Alliance Defending Freedom

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_court_cases...

    In a significant victory, the Supreme Court ruled that opening legislative sessions with prayer was constitutional. [25] [26] McCullen v. Coakley (2014). ADF obtained a unanimous Supreme Court victory in this case which struck down “buffer zones” which were designed to restrict anti-abortion activists. The ruling was a setback for the ...

  4. Liberal justices Sotomayor and Jackson issue scathing ...

    www.aol.com/news/liberal-justices-sotomayor...

    Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a blistering dissent in the Trump immunity ruling, arguing that it "reshapes the institution of the presidency" and "makes a mockery" of the ...

  5. List of wrongful convictions in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wrongful...

    United States v. Shipp is the only criminal trial of the Supreme Court in its entire history. It is considered an important decision in that it affirmed the right of the US Supreme Court to intervene in state criminal cases. Shipp and several of his co-defendants were convicted and sentenced to terms from 2–3 months in federal prison. [25]

  6. Jackson: Supreme Court ‘has to be prepared to respond’ to ...

    www.aol.com/jackson-supreme-court-prepared...

    Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson in a new interview said she is “prepared as anyone can be” for the possibility that this year’s presidential election could end up before the high ...

  7. What the Supreme Court's ruling on affirmative action means ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-courts-ruling...

    The Supreme Court decided two cases brought by Students for Fair Admissions, a group headed by Edward Blum, a conservative legal strategist who has spent years fighting affirmative action.

  8. United States v. Jackson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Jackson

    The court also objected, as the District Court had, that the Act could punish a defendant for asserting their right to a jury trial. Under the Act, a defendant who pleads guilty cannot be sentenced to death, since no jury has the chance to recommend the death penalty.

  9. ‘It changed the world.’ How a 1984 Supreme Court decision ...

    www.aol.com/news/changed-world-1984-supreme...

    And, at the root of it all: that Supreme Court case in 1984. NCAA vs. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma. The case represents a line of demarcation in college athletics, a before and ...