Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) in English law were created under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, and came into effect on 1 October 2007. The LPA replaced the former enduring powers of attorney (EPA) which were narrower in scope. [1] Their purpose is to meet the needs of those who can see a time when they will lack capacity to look after their ...
Alison Braley, writing in the McGill Law Journal, was critical of the majority reasons, writing that "Fraser undoubtedly provides a setback for workers' collective bargaining rights in Canada." [ 8 ] In the Ottawa Law Review, Professor Brian Langille criticized the logic underpinning the majority's reasons, and the adoption of a "substantial ...
The bill amended the City of Toronto Act, 2006 changing the number of wards comprising Toronto City Council, reducing the number of wards from 47 to 25. The Better Local Government Act passed its third reading, received Royal Assent , and came into force on August 14, 2018.
Halpern v Canada (AG), [2003] O.J. No. 2268 is a June 10, 2003 decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in which the Court found that the common law definition of marriage, which defined marriage as between one man and one woman, violated section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Alan N. Young (December 1, 1956 – December 7, 2024) was a Canadian lawyer and professor of law at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto, Ontario.Young was notable for leading several Charter challenges against Canadian laws, including the landmark Bedford case which resulted in Canada's prostitution laws being struck down.
A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada, encompassing six of seven justices, allowed the appeal and struck down both laws in question. The majority opinion sought to "clarify the scope of the constitutional protection of collective bargaining" recognized in BC Health Services and Fraser. [5] The Court summarized section 2(d) protections as ...
Additionally, the court checked whether the parties ' intended to be joint authors ' in the work. [23] The court held that Taylor was not a joint author of the script due to lack of contribution of sufficient expression. [24] It observed that no evidence was shown to establish Taylor's role as anything more than giving advice and ideas. [24]
Ontario (AG) v Canada (AG), [1] also known as the Local Prohibition Case, is a significant Canadian constitutional decision by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, at that time the highest court in the British Empire, including Canada.