Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In Weeks v. United States , 232 U.S. 383 (1914) , the Supreme Court held that the warrantless seizure of items from a private residence violates the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution . It also prevented local officers from securing evidence by means prohibited under the federal exclusionary rule and giving it to their federal colleagues.
Weeks v. United States: 232 U.S. 383 (1914) establishment of the exclusionary rule for illegally obtained evidence Ocampo v. United States: 234 U.S. 91 (1914) sometimes considered one of the Insular Cases: Shreveport Rate Case: 234 U.S. 342 (1914) Commerce clause, regulation of intrastate railroad rates Coppage v. Kansas: 236 U.S. 1 (1915)
Weeks v. United States , 232 U.S. 383 (1914) was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that the warrantless seizure of items from a private residence constitutes a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution . [ 1 ]
Case name Citation Date decided Brancato v. Gunn: 528 U.S. 1: October 12, 1999 Antonelli v. Caridine: 528 U.S. 3: 1999: Judd v. United States Dist. Court for Western ...
The majority reviewed the history of the exclusionary rule established in early 20th-century cases such as Weeks v. United States (1914) and Gouled v. United States, (1921) and applied to state courts in Mapp v. Ohio (1961). The exclusionary rule is not a right provided by the Constitution itself, it is a judicially-created prophylactic rule to ...
Talk: Weeks v. United States. Add languages. ... Download QR code; Print/export Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects ...
The case Miles v. United States establishes that a second wife may testify as to her husband's bigamy because their marriage is not de jure. [38] Oregon: Married women were granted trade licenses and control over their earnings. [4] 1881. Vermont: Married women were granted separate economy and trade licenses. [4]
On appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, the appellants, federally recognized Native American Tribe and the Secretary of the Interior, challenged a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma granting appellee, unrecognized Native American tribe, an injunction in an action seeking a declaration that appellee's ...