Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A central concept in science and the scientific method is that conclusions must be empirically based on the evidence of the senses. Both natural and social sciences use working hypotheses that are testable by observation and experiment.
Scientific evidence is evidence that serves to either support or counter a scientific theory or hypothesis, [1] although scientists also use evidence in other ways, such as when applying theories to practical problems. [2] Such evidence is expected to be empirical evidence and interpretable in accordance with the scientific method.
As statistics and data sets have become more complex, [a] [b] questions have arisen regarding the validity of models and the inferences drawn from them. There is a wide range of conflicting opinions on modelling. Models can be based on scientific theory or ad hoc data analysis, each employing different methods. Advocates exist for each approach ...
Statistical conclusion validity is the degree to which conclusions about the relationship among variables based on the data are correct or 'reasonable'. This began as being solely about whether the statistical conclusion about the relationship of the variables was correct, but now there is a movement towards moving to 'reasonable' conclusions ...
In this classification, a deductive-nomological (D-N) explanation of an occurrence is a valid deduction whose conclusion states that the outcome to be explained did in fact occur. The deductive argument is called an explanation, its premisses are called the explanans (L: explaining) and the conclusion is called the explanandum (L: to be explained).
The history of scientific method considers changes in the methodology of scientific inquiry, not the history of science itself. The development of rules for scientific reasoning has not been straightforward; scientific method has been the subject of intense and recurring debate throughout the history of science, and eminent natural philosophers and scientists have argued for the primacy of ...
A form of reasoning characterized by drawing a conclusion based on the best available explanation for a set of premises. Often used in hypothesis formation. Abelian logic A type of relevance logic that rejects contraction and accepts that ((A → B) → B) → A. [3] [4] [5] absorption
Pose and evaluate arguments based on evidence and to apply conclusions from such arguments appropriately. [3] Scientific literacy may also be defined in language similar to the definitions of ocean literacy, [4] Earth science literacy [5] and climate literacy. [6] Thus a scientifically literate person can: