Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The behavioral biometric of keystroke dynamics uses the manner and rhythm in which an individual types characters on a keyboard or keypad. [4] [5] [6] The user's keystroke rhythms are measured to develop a unique biometric template of the user's typing pattern for future authentication. [7]
Keystroke logging, often referred to as keylogging or keyboard capturing, is the action of recording (logging) the keys struck on a keyboard, [1] [2] typically covertly, so that a person using the keyboard is unaware that their actions are being monitored. Data can then be retrieved by the person operating the logging program.
Private biometrics is a form of encrypted biometrics, also called privacy-preserving biometric authentication methods, in which the biometric payload is a one-way, homomorphically encrypted feature vector that is 0.05% the size of the original biometric template and can be searched with full accuracy, speed and privacy.
Language links are at the top of the page across from the title.
The origins of keystroke inference attacks can be traced back to the mid-1980s when academic interest first emerged in utilizing various emanations from devices to deduce their state. While keystroke inference attacks were not explicitly discussed during this period, the declassified introductory textbook on TEMPEST standards, NACSIM 5000 ...
The keystroke-level model consists of six operators: the first four are physical motor operators followed by one mental operator and one system response operator: [5] K (keystroke or button press): it is the most frequent operator and means keys and not characters (so e.g. pressing SHIFT is a separate K operation). The time for this operator ...
A keystroke sequence like STO 4 2 (store the currently-displayed number into memory 42) would be encoded as 42 42. In this case the first 42 is the key code for the STO key, but the second 42 is not a key code, but a memory register number.
A number of different language design decisions have been referred to as evidence of "strong" or "weak" typing. Many of these are more accurately understood as the presence or absence of type safety, memory safety, static type-checking, or dynamic type-checking.