enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of United States patent law cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    The U.S. Supreme Court will only review cases on a discretionary basis and rarely decides patent cases. Unless overruled by a Supreme Court case, Federal Circuit decisions can dictate the results of both patent prosecution and litigation as they are universally binding on all United States district courts and the United States Patent and ...

  3. Rambus Inc. v. Nvidia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia

    Rambus Inc. v. NVIDIA Corporation was a patent infringement case between Rambus and Nvidia. The case was heard in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California . Rambus Inc , founded in 1990, is an American technology company that designs , develops and licenses chip interface technologies and architectures that are ...

  4. Alcatel-Lucent v. Microsoft Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcatel-Lucent_v...

    Alcatel-Lucent v. Microsoft Corp., also known as Lucent Technologies Inc. v. Gateway Inc., was a long-running patent infringement case between Alcatel-Lucent and Microsoft litigated in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California and appealed multiple times to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

  5. Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quanta_Computer,_Inc._v...

    Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., 553 U.S. 617 (2008), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court reaffirmed the validity of the patent exhaustion doctrine. [1]

  6. List of United States Supreme Court patent case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    State trade secret law not preempted by patent law. Dann v. Johnston: 425 U.S. 219: 1976: Patentability of a claim for a business method patent (but the decision turns on obviousness rather than patent-eligibility). Sakraida v. Ag Pro: 425 U.S. 273: 1976

  7. Apple wins $250 US jury verdict in patent case over Masimo ...

    www.aol.com/news/masimo-smartwatches-infringe...

    Apple's attorneys told the court the "ultimate purpose" of its lawsuit was not money, but to win an injunction against sales of Masimo's smartwatches after an infringement ruling.

  8. Monsanto legal cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto_legal_cases

    In 2014, the Los Angeles Superior Court found that Monsanto was not liable for cancers claimed to be from PCBs permeating the food supply of three plaintiffs who had developed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. After a four-week trial, the jury found that Monsanto’s production and sale of PCBs between 1935 and 1977 were not substantial causes of the cancer.

  9. Patent prosecution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_prosecution

    Patent prosecution is distinct from patent litigation, which describes legal action relating to the infringement of patents. The rules and laws governing patent prosecution are often laid out in manuals released by the Patent Offices of various governments, such as the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) in the United States, or the ...

  1. Related searches patent prosecution vs patent litigation court cases california los angeles

    patent law cases in americalist of patent law cases
    us patent lawsuits