Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Read Identifying reliable sources. It is a page intended to help readers search for and identify reliable sources. It is a page intended to help readers search for and identify reliable sources. If you have a source in mind already, you can check its reliability by comparing it to the criteria at that page, or using one of the following methods.
Source bias is the tendency to select information sources to support a confirmation bias or negativity bias on a particular set of beliefs or values. [1] Source bias plays an important role in generating echo chambers .
The following presents a non-exhaustive list of sources whose reliability and use on Wikipedia are frequently discussed. This list summarizes prior consensus and consolidates links to the most in-depth and recent discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere on Wikipedia.
The only bias that should be evident is the bias attributed to the source. Indicate the relative prominence of opposing views. Ensure that the reporting of different views on a subject adequately reflects the relative levels of support for those views and that it does not give a false impression of parity , or give undue weight to a particular ...
The first step is being able to identify examples of implicit bias in everyday life—and then being aware of your own biases. ... an expert on the psychology of racism and the author of Why Are ...
Distinguish between objective research (based on evidence) and opinion pieces (reflecting personal viewpoints). Research funded by vested organizations may be biased; check acknowledgments or disclosure sections. Authors' affiliations may indicate biases; this should be considered when using their work for your research.
The CRAAP test is a test to check the objective reliability of information sources across academic disciplines. CRAAP is an acronym for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. [1]
Publication bias is a type of bias with regard to what academic research is likely to be published because of a tendency among researchers and journal editors to prefer some outcomes rather than others (e.g., results showing a significant finding), which leads to a problematic bias in the published literature. [138]