Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Most of ResearchGate's users are involved in medicine or biology, [10] [12] though it also has participants from engineering, law, computer science, agricultural sciences, and psychology, among others. [10] ResearchGate published an author-level metric in the form of an "RG Score" since 2012. [15] RG score is not a citation impact measure.
This parameter will be the ID string used in the URL at ResearchGate. When one parameter is used, the link text is the title of the Wikipedia article where the template is used. URL:
The RIS file format—two letters, two spaces and a hyphen—is a tagged format for expressing bibliographic citations.According to the specifications, [3] [4] [5] the lines must end with the ASCII carriage return and line feed characters.
According to the manifesto, "Science and technology indicators are prone to conceptual ambiguity and uncertainty and require strong assumptions that are not universally accepted. The meaning of citation counts, for example, has long been debated. Thus, best practice uses multiple indicators to provide a more robust and pluralistic picture." [8]
Editorial commentary, analysis and opinion pieces, whether written by the editors of the publication or outside authors (invited op-eds and letters to the editor from notable figures) are reliable primary sources for statements attributed to that editor or author, but are rarely reliable for statements of fact (see also § Statements of opinion ...
ScienceDirect also competes for audience with other large aggregators and hosts of scholarly communication content such as academic social network ResearchGate and open access repository arXiv, as well as with fully open access publishing venues and mega journals like PLOS. ScienceDirect also carries Cell.
For example, a confirmed information from a reliable source has rating A1, an unknown-validity information from a new source without reputation is rated F6, an inconsistent illogical information from a known liar is E5, a confirmed information from a moderately doubtful source is C1.
Due to a vast development of unique identifiers in the research field, there has been numbers of systems serving identification process, for example, ORCID, Scopus, ResearcherID and ResearchGate. [6] Missing literature or informational mistakes were frequently shown when one researcher uploaded several profiles on different platforms.