Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A brain in a vat that believes it is walking. In philosophy, the brain in a vat (BIV) is a scenario used in a variety of thought experiments intended to draw out certain features of human conceptions of knowledge, reality, truth, mind, consciousness, and meaning.
For a brain in a vat that had only ever experienced the simulated world, the statement "I'm not a brain in a vat" is true. The only possible brains and vats it could be referring to are simulated, and it is true that it is not a simulated brain in a simulated vat. By the same argument, saying "I'm a brain in a vat" would be false. [8]
A "brain in a vat"—Putnam uses this thought experiment to argue that skeptical scenarios are impossible. In epistemology , Putnam is known for his argument against skeptical scenarios based on the " brain in a vat " thought experiment (a modernized version of Descartes 's evil demon hypothesis).
Physicists use the Boltzmann brain thought experiment as a reductio ad absurdum argument for evaluating competing scientific theories. In contrast to brain in a vat thought experiments, which are about perception and thought, Boltzmann brains are used in cosmology to test our assumptions about thermodynamics and the
An isolated brain is a brain kept alive in vitro, either by perfusion or by a blood substitute, often an oxygenated solution of various salts, or by submerging the brain in oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). [1] It is the biological counterpart of brain in a vat.
The Brain in a Vat (ed.). Cambridge University Press 2016; Externalism, Self-Knowledge, and Skepticism (ed.). Cambridge University Press 2015; Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology (ed.). Oxford University Press 2007; Gray Matters: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind, with Andrew Pessin, M.E. Sharpe 1997
Where S is a subject, sk is a skeptical possibility, such as the evil demon hypothesis or the more recent brain in a vat hypothesis, and q is any fact that supposedly exists in the world (e.g. the fact that there are trees and mountains): If S knows that q, then S knows that not-sk. S doesn't know that not-sk. Therefore, S doesn't know that q.
Such scenarios had been used many times in science fiction but in philosophy it is now routine to refer to being like a 'brain in a vat' after Hilary Putnam produced an argument which, ironically, purported to show that "the supposition that we are actually brains in a vat, although it violates no physical law, and is perfectly consistent with ...