Ad
related to: pictures with an attribution license fee
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Broadly defined, practically any publication is commercial and a license fee might be required; [1] yet other museums require a license for any reproduction. [11] The basis used by museums to claim reproduction rights varies, too: [12] some museums prohibit visitors taking pictures of their collections unless licensed to do so;
The author, or the licensor in case the author did a contractual transfer of rights, needs to have the exclusive rights on the work. If the work has already been published under a public license, it can be uploaded by any third party, once more on another platform, by using a compatible license, and making reference and attribution to the original license (e.g. by referring to the URL of the ...
If the image is tagged as Fair use, then most probably you cannot.See the Fair use section for more details. You can for all other images released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License or a similarly free license provided you abide by the license conditions – include a link back to the wikipage for that picture or to the creator's website and license any ...
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 27 December 2024. Organization creating copyright licenses for the public release of creative works This article is about the organization. For their eponymous licenses, see Creative Commons license. For usage of product, see List of major Creative Commons licensed works. Creative Commons Creative ...
For example, Wikipedia can accept images under CC-BY-SA (Attribution-Share Alike) as a free license, but not CC-BY-SA-NC (Attribution-Share Alike-Non-Commercial). A list of possible licenses which are considered "free enough" for Wikipedia are listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.
Reproduction fees are charged by image collections for the right to reproduce images in publications. This is not the same as a copyright fee, but is charged separately, as is the cost of the provision of the image. It can be charged where an image is out of copyright, and reflects the possession of the image by a collection.
Select an image from your search with a copyright holder that may be willing to give you permission to use their image as public domain or under the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License. In general, copyright holders that earn money by charging reproduction fees for their images are unlikely to give them away for free.
-Close up or detail photos are typically not permitted if the image is Non-Free.-Non-free images should only be uploaded after your article is live as unused non-free images need to be deleted from wikipedia. The proper license for these kinds of images is {{Non-free 3D art}}. The template clearly states that a fair-use rationale must be used ...
Ad
related to: pictures with an attribution license fee