enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of data-serialization formats - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_data...

    JSON: No Smile Format Specification: Yes No Yes Partial (JSON Schema Proposal, other JSON schemas/IDLs) Partial (via JSON APIs implemented with Smile backend, on Jackson, Python) — SOAP: W3C: XML: Yes W3C Recommendations: SOAP/1.1 SOAP/1.2: Partial (Efficient XML Interchange, Binary XML, Fast Infoset, MTOM, XSD base64 data) Yes Built-in id ...

  3. Comparison of video container formats - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video...

    Some are combinations of common container formats and audio and video coding profiles, such as AVCHD and DivX formats. Although sometimes compared to DivX products, Xvid is neither a container format nor a video format, it is a software library that encodes video using specific coding profiles of the common MPEG-4 ASP video format. Those types ...

  4. YAML - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YAML

    YAML (/ ˈ j æ m əl /, rhymes with camel [4]) was first proposed by Clark Evans in 2001, [15] who designed it together with Ingy döt Net [16] and Oren Ben-Kiki. [16]Originally YAML was said to mean Yet Another Markup Language, [17] because it was released in an era that saw a proliferation of markup languages for presentation and connectivity (HTML, XML, SGML, etc.).

  5. JSON - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSON

    YAML version 1.2 is a superset of JSON; prior versions were not strictly compatible. For example, escaping a slash / with a backslash \ is valid in JSON, but was not valid in YAML. [46] YAML supports comments, while JSON does not. [46] [44] [21]

  6. TOML - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOML

    Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language (TOML, originally Tom's Own Markup Language [2]) is a file format for configuration files. [3] It is intended to be easy to read and write due to obvious semantics which aim to be "minimal", and it is designed to map unambiguously to a dictionary.

  7. Comparison of video player software - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_player...

    The following comparison of video players compares general and technical information for notable software media player programs. For the purpose of this comparison, video players are defined as any media player which can play video , even if it can also play audio files.

  8. List of open file formats - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open_file_formats

    Ogg – container for Vorbis, FLAC, Speex and Opus (audio formats) & Theora (a video format), each of which is an open format; Opus [2] – a lossy audio compression format developed by the IETF. Suitable for VoIP, videoconferencing (just audio), music transmission over the Internet and streaming applications (just audio). Speex – speech codec

  9. Comparison of download managers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_download...

    This comparison contains download managers, and also file sharing applications that can be used as download managers (using the http, https and ftp-protocol). For pure file sharing applications see the Comparison of file sharing applications .