Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
English: An Act for the more effectual Administration of Justice in England and Ireland by the issuing of Writs of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum, in certain Cases. Publication date 28 July 1804
Habeas corpus (/ ˈ h eɪ b i ə s ˈ k ɔːr p ə s / ⓘ; from Medieval Latin, lit. ' you should have the body ') [1] is an equitable remedy [2] by which a report can be made to a court alleging the unlawful detention or imprisonment of an individual, and requesting that the court order the individual's custodian (usually a prison official) to bring the prisoner to court, to determine ...
File:Habeas Corpus Act (Ireland) 1781 (I) (AIP Geo3-21-22-11).pdf. Add languages. Page contents not supported in other languages. File; Talk; English.
If the file has been modified from its original state, some details may not fully reflect the modified file. Short title WIKILEAKS - Congressional Research Service - Enemy Combatant Detainees: Habeas Corpus Challenges in Federal Court, September 10, 2008
In United States law, habeas corpus (/ ˈ h eɪ b i ə s ˈ k ɔːr p ə s /) is a recourse challenging the reasons or conditions of a person's confinement under color of law.A petition for habeas corpus is filed with a court that has jurisdiction over the custodian, and if granted, a writ is issued directing the custodian to bring the confined person before the court for examination into ...
The literal translation from Latin of habeas data is "[we command] you have the data," or "you [the data subject] have the data." [ 1 ] The remedy varies from country to country, but in general, it is designed to protect, by means of an individual complaint presented to a constitutional court , the data , image, privacy, honour, information ...
Within days of the AEDPA being introduced, there were disagreements between Republican and Democratic leadership over combining federal habeas corpus reform with the anti-terrorism law. [10] Republicans refused to hold hearings, consult with habeas experts or negotiate with congressional Democrats. They fast-tracked the bill without a report. [9]
The court eventually declared that they could not issue a writ, because the Habeas Corpus Act 1862 prevented them from issuing a writ to any colony or Dominion possessing a court which could also issue a writ. Since the Free State possessed such a court, the English divisional court could not act. [7]