enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Students_for_Fair...

   Both Harvard and North Carolina were decided jointly on June 29, 2023, with the Court ruling that race-based admissions adopted by both Harvard University and UNC were unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

3. UNC’s race-conscious admissions policy is unconstitutional ...

   www.aol.com/news/unc-race-conscious-admissions...

   The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against UNC-Chapel Hill’s race-conscious undergraduate admissions policy, saying the university’s consideration of race in admissions is a violation of ...

4. Harvard, UPenn and MIT presidents face backlash after hearing ...

   www.aol.com/news/harvard-upenn-mit-presidents...

   Here's what happened at the hearing and what's happening as the backlash continues to unfold. Harvard, UPenn and MIT presidents face backlash after hearing on antisemitism on campus. Here’s what ...

5. Read the Supreme Court decision in UNC and Harvard’s race ...

   www.aol.com/read-supreme-court-decision-unc...

   For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

6. Equal Protection Clause - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Protection_Clause

   Harvard (2023), and its companion case Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina (2023), the Supreme Court held that race and ethnicity cannot be used in admissions decisions. In other words, preferential treatment based on race or ethnicity violates The Equal Protection Clause.

7. Why Claudine Gay still has a job after Penn’s Liz Magill ouster

   www.aol.com/harvard-antisemitism-hearing-why...

   Claudine Gay, Harvard University’s embattled president, has strong institutional backing as she faces a flurry of criticism over her handling of alleged antisemitism at one of the nation’s ...

8. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

   Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976) North Carolina's new death penalty statute is unconstitutional because it calls for a mandatory death sentence to be imposed. Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 325 (1976) Louisiana's new death penalty statute is unconstitutional because it calls for a mandatory death sentence for a large range of ...

9. How will college entry change after Supreme Court ruled UNC’s ...

   www.aol.com/news/college-entry-change-supreme...

   For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us