Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
PEORIA, Ill. (WMBD) — A trio of appellate court judges in Springfield ordered a new detention hearing for a woman who was charged with a deadly 2023 stabbing. The decision, handed down Sept. 24 ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
At any time, police may approach a person and ask questions. Police may suspect involvement in a crime, but may lack knowledge of any "specific and articulable facts" [9] that would justify a detention or arrest, and hope to obtain these facts from the questioning. The person approached is not required to identify themselves or answer any other ...
[4] [5] 13990 [6] 3 13767: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements: January 25, 2017 January 30, 2017 82 FR 8793 2017-02095 [7] [8] 14010 [9] 4 13768: Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States [a] 82 FR 8799 2017-02102 [22] [23] 13993 [24] 5 13769: Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the ...
On November 13, 2001 U.S. President George W. Bush issued a military order titled Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain Non-Citizens in the War Against Terrorism. [1] The order: Defines which individuals the President considers subject to the order. States that the U.S. Secretary of Defense will be ultimately responsible for the individuals.
The life cycle of federal supervision for a defendant. United States federal probation and supervised release are imposed at sentencing. The difference between probation and supervised release is that the former is imposed as a substitute for imprisonment, [1] or in addition to home detention, [2] while the latter is imposed in addition to imprisonment.
Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426 (2004), was a United States Supreme Court case, in which José Padilla, an American citizen, sought habeas corpus relief against Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, as a result of his detention by the military as an "unlawful combatant."
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court recognized the power of the U.S. government to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens must have the rights of due process, and the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an impartial authority.