enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Converse (logic) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Converse_(logic)

    The converse of that statement is "If I am mortal, then I am a human," which is not necessarily true. However, the converse of a statement with mutually inclusive terms remains true, given the truth of the original proposition. This is equivalent to saying that the converse of a definition is true.

  3. List of logic symbols - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_logic_symbols

    definition: is defined as metalanguage:= means "from now on, is defined to be another name for ." This is a statement in the metalanguage, not the object language. The notation may occasionally be seen in physics, meaning the same as :=.

  4. Contraposition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraposition

    Conversion (the converse), "If I wear my coat, then it is raining ." The converse is actually the contrapositive of the inverse, and so always has the same truth value as the inverse (which as stated earlier does not always share the same truth value as that of the original proposition).

  5. If and only if - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_and_only_if

    Wherever logic is applied, especially in mathematical discussions, it has the same meaning as above: it is an abbreviation for if and only if, indicating that one statement is both necessary and sufficient for the other. This is an example of mathematical jargon (although, as noted above, if is more often used than iff in statements of definition).

  6. Affirming the consequent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent

    In propositional logic, affirming the consequent (also known as converse error, fallacy of the converse, or confusion of necessity and sufficiency) is a formal fallacy (or an invalid form of argument) that is committed when, in the context of an indicative conditional statement, it is stated that because the consequent is true, therefore the ...

  7. Logical connective - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_connective

    The meanings of natural language connectives are not precisely identical to their nearest equivalents in classical logic. In particular, disjunction can receive an exclusive interpretation in many languages.

  8. Logical equivalence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_equivalence

    In logic and mathematics, statements and are said to be logically equivalent if they have the same truth value in every model. [1] The logical equivalence of p {\displaystyle p} and q {\displaystyle q} is sometimes expressed as p ≡ q {\displaystyle p\equiv q} , p :: q {\displaystyle p::q} , E p q {\displaystyle {\textsf {E}}pq} , or p q ...

  9. Converse nonimplication - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Converse_nonimplication

    In logic, converse nonimplication [1] is a logical connective which is the negation of converse implication (equivalently, the negation of the converse of implication). Definition [ edit ]