Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The key to the argument is the following Claim. The set V of all elements a of D such that a 2 ≤ 0 is a vector subspace of D of dimension n − 1.Moreover D = R ⊕ V as R-vector spaces, which implies that V generates D as an algebra.
The 1-form dz − y dx. on R 3 maximally violates the assumption of Frobenius' theorem. These planes appear to twist along the y-axis.It is not integrable, as can be verified by drawing an infinitesimal square in the x-y plane, and follow the path along the one-forms.
The most famous of these are the Cartan–Kähler theorem, which only works for real analytic differential systems, and the Cartan–Kuranishi prolongation theorem. See § Further reading for details. The Newlander–Nirenberg theorem gives integrability conditions for an almost-complex structure.
Some solutions of a differential equation having a regular singular point with indicial roots = and .. In mathematics, the method of Frobenius, named after Ferdinand Georg Frobenius, is a way to find an infinite series solution for a linear second-order ordinary differential equation of the form ″ + ′ + = with ′ and ″.
Frobenius reciprocity theorem in group representation theory describing the reciprocity relation between restricted and induced representations on a subgroup Perron–Frobenius theorem in matrix theory concerning the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a matrix with positive real coefficients
Friendship theorem (graph theory) Frobenius determinant theorem (group theory) Frobenius reciprocity theorem (group representations) Frobenius theorem ; Frobenius theorem (abstract algebras) Froda's theorem (mathematical analysis) Frucht's theorem (graph theory) Fubini's theorem (integration) Fubini's theorem on differentiation (real analysis)
He also posed the following problem: If, in the above theorem, k = 1, then the solutions of the equation x n = 1 in G form a subgroup. Many years ago this problem was solved for solvable groups. [3] Only in 1991, after the classification of finite simple groups, was this problem solved in general.
Since z = 1 − x, the solution of the hypergeometric equation at x = 1 is the same as the solution for this equation at z = 0. But the solution at z = 0 is identical to the solution we obtained for the point x = 0, if we replace each γ by α + β − γ + 1. Hence, to get the solutions, we just make this substitution in the previous results.