Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Level of measurement or scale of measure is a classification that describes the nature of information within the values assigned to variables. [1] Psychologist Stanley Smith Stevens developed the best-known classification with four levels, or scales, of measurement: nominal , ordinal , interval , and ratio .
Given an r-sample statistic, one can create an n-sample statistic by something similar to bootstrapping (taking the average of the statistic over all subsamples of size r). This procedure is known to have certain good properties and the result is a U-statistic. The sample mean and sample variance are of this form, for r = 1 and r = 2.
The observed differences among sample averages could not be reasonably caused by random chance itself The result is statistically significant Note that when there are only two groups for the one-way ANOVA F -test, F = t 2 {\displaystyle F=t^{2}} where t is the Student's t {\displaystyle t} statistic .
What level (level of measurement) of data is involved (nominal, ordinal, interval, or ratio)? [2] What will the results be used for? What should be used - a scale, index, or typology? [3] What types of statistical analysis would be useful? Choose to use a comparative scale or a non-comparative scale. [4]
The concept of data type is similar to the concept of level of measurement, but more specific. For example, count data requires a different distribution (e.g. a Poisson distribution or binomial distribution) than non-negative real-valued data require, but both fall under the same level of measurement (a ratio scale).
The ratio estimates are asymmetrical and symmetrical tests such as the t test should not be used to generate confidence intervals. The bias is of the order O(1/n) (see big O notation) so as the sample size (n) increases, the bias will asymptotically approach 0. Therefore, the estimator is approximately unbiased for large sample sizes.
The calculation of likelihood ratios for tests with continuous values or more than two outcomes is similar to the calculation for dichotomous outcomes; a separate likelihood ratio is simply calculated for every level of test result and is called interval or stratum specific likelihood ratios. [6]
For comparing significance tests, a meaningful measure of efficiency can be defined based on the sample size required for the test to achieve a given task power. [14] Pitman efficiency [15] and Bahadur efficiency (or Hodges–Lehmann efficiency) [16] [17] [18] relate to the comparison of the performance of statistical hypothesis testing procedures.