Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
PERT network chart for a seven-month project with five milestones (10 through 50) and six activities (A through F). The program evaluation and review technique (PERT) is a statistical tool used in project management, which was designed to analyze and represent the tasks involved in completing a given project.
PERT network chart for a seven-month project with five milestones (10 through 50) and six activities (A through F). work breakdown structure, A work breakdown structure (WBS), in project management is a deliverable oriented decomposition of a project into smaller components. A Gantt chart is a type of bar chart, that illustrates a project schedule.
A plot of project cumulative costs vs time especially to show both early date and late date curves; EVM implementations for large or complex projects include many more features, such as indicators and forecasts of cost performance (over budget or under budget) and schedule performance (behind schedule or ahead of schedule).
The project has two critical paths: activities B and C, or A, D, and F – giving a minimum project time of 7 months with fast tracking. Activity E is sub-critical, and has a float of 1 month. The critical path method ( CPM ), or critical path analysis ( CPA ), is an algorithm for scheduling a set of project activities. [ 1 ]
Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique (GERT) is a network analysis technique used in project management that allows probabilistic treatment both network logic and estimation of activity duration. The technique was first described in 1966 by Dr. Alan B. Pritsker of Purdue University and WW Happ.
The Test and Evaluation Master Plan documents the overall structure and objectives of the Test & Evaluation for a program. [3] It covers activities over a program’s life-cycle and identifies evaluation criteria for the testers. [4] The test and evaluation master plan consists of individual tests. Each test contains the following. Test Scenario
The CIPP framework was developed as a means of linking evaluation with program decision-making.It aims to provide an analytic and rational basis for program decision-making, based on a cycle of planning, structuring, implementing and reviewing and revising decisions, each examined through a different aspect of evaluation –context, input, process and product evaluation.
Planning a program evaluation can be broken up into four parts: focusing the evaluation, collecting the information, using the information, and managing the evaluation. [28] Program evaluation involves reflecting on questions about evaluation purpose, what questions are necessary to ask, and what will be done with information gathered.