Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The case dealt with the NCAA's restrictions on providing college athletes with non-cash compensation for academic-related purposes, such as computers and internships, which the NCAA maintained was to prevent the appearance that the student athletes were being paid to play or treated as professional athletes.
The case ultimately involved questions about the responsibilities of universities during student protests. The case began in 2016 with an incident of shoplifting by a black Oberlin College student at Gibson's Bakery and subsequent arrest of three black students for assaulting a staff member. Students, faculty members and employees of Oberlin ...
However, in all other regards, this should fall under similar guidelines that apply to in-class exams. More specifically, students may not discuss the exam with others—this includes resident tutors, writing centers, etc." [4] [18] The use of etc. has been questioned. [19] [20] Students complained about confusing questions on the final exam.
The efforts of Clery's parents led to the 1990 passage of the Clery Act, a U.S. federal law requiring all universities and colleges that participate in federal student financial aid programs to report crime statistics, alert their respective campuses of imminent dangers, and distribute an Annual Campus Security Report to current and prospective ...
NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85 (1984), was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) television plan violated the Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts, which were designed to prohibit group actions that restrained open competition and trade.
Mark Riddell, who took tests on behalf of the students, was suspended from his position as director of college entrance exam preparation at IMG Academy and fired a week later. [ 53 ] [ 85 ] [ 233 ] On March 26, 2019, Yale became the first university to rescind the admission of a student associated with the scandal. [ 227 ]
Holmstrom and her colleagues gave a group of college students an assignment: Each day, give one person a compliment, tell them they cared about them or share a joke over the phone or in person.
With its companion case, Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina , the Supreme Court effectively overruled Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) [ 6 ] and Regents of the University of California v.