Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
United States v. Texas, 599 U.S. ___ (2023), a case in which the Supreme Court considered whether the states have Article III standing to challenge the legality of the Department of Homeland Security's guidelines for the enforcement of civil immigration law. United States v. Texas, a case in which the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ...
Federal Republic of Germany v. United States, 526 U.S. 111 (1999) Medellín v. Dretke, 544 U.S. 660 (2005) Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008) Leal Garcia v. Texas, 564 U.S. 940 (2011) – Courts cannot stay an execution on the grounds that Congress might eventually enact a statute to enforce an international law.
This category is for case law of the United States in the year 1981. 1976; 1977; 1978; ... Montana v. United States; N. New York v. ... Texas Department of Community ...
United States v. Texas, 579 U.S. 547 (2016), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding the constitutionality of the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) program. In a one-line per curiam decision, an equally divided Court affirmed the lower-court injunction blocking the President Barack Obama's program.
June – The United States enters the severe early 1980s recession, exactly a year after the more minor 1980 recession ended; the unemployment rate is 7.2% June 5 – The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that five homosexual men in Los Angeles , California , have a rare form of pneumonia seen only in patients with weakened ...
William H. Kennedy, United States Attorney in San Diego, was dismissed by President Reagan after he mentioned that the CIA was involved in a smuggling case. (1982) [345] [346] Marjory Mecklenburg (R) Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Resources used travel funds to see her son's Denver Bronco games. She resigned.
A lump sum, about $28.75 million, will be deducted from the $115 million to pay attorney fees and up to $225,000 for any other expenses that were incurred or will be incurred during litigation.
Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that held even when a treaty constitutes an international commitment, it is not binding domestic law unless it has been implemented by an act of the U.S. Congress or contains language expressing that it is "self-executing" upon ratification. [1]