Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In linear algebra, Cramer's rule is an explicit formula for the solution of a system of linear equations with as many equations as unknowns, valid whenever the system has a unique solution. It expresses the solution in terms of the determinants of the (square) coefficient matrix and of matrices obtained from it by replacing one column by the ...
In mathematics, a unimodular matrix M is a square integer matrix having determinant +1 or −1. Equivalently, it is an integer matrix that is invertible over the integers: there is an integer matrix N that is its inverse (these are equivalent under Cramer's rule).
Though Cramer's rule is important theoretically, it has little practical value for large matrices, since the computation of large determinants is somewhat cumbersome. (Indeed, large determinants are most easily computed using row reduction.)
This is the same as the maximum number of linearly independent rows that can be chosen from the matrix, or equivalently the number of pivots. For example, the 3 × 3 matrix in the example above has rank two. [9] The rank of a matrix is also equal to the dimension of the column space.
Coefficient matrices are used in algorithms such as Gaussian elimination and Cramer's rule to find solutions to the system. The leading entry (sometimes leading coefficient [ citation needed ] ) of a row in a matrix is the first nonzero entry in that row.
This example with rank of n − 1 is a non-invertible matrix: = (). We can see the rank of this 2-by-2 matrix is 1, which is n − 1 ≠ n, so it is non-invertible. Consider the following 2-by-2 matrix:
Consider the system of equations x + y + 2z = 3, x + y + z = 1, 2x + 2y + 2z = 2.. The coefficient matrix is = [], and the augmented matrix is (|) = [].Since both of these have the same rank, namely 2, there exists at least one solution; and since their rank is less than the number of unknowns, the latter being 3, there are infinitely many solutions.
In mathematics, Cramer's paradox or the Cramer–Euler paradox [1] is the statement that the number of points of intersection of two higher-order curves in the plane can be greater than the number of arbitrary points that are usually needed to define one such curve. It is named after the Genevan mathematician Gabriel Cramer.