Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Richard E. Roeper (born October 17, 1959) [1] is an American columnist and film critic for the Chicago Sun-Times. He co-hosted the television series At the Movies with Roger Ebert from 2000 to 2008, serving as the late Gene Siskel's successor. [2] [3] From 2010 to 2014, he co-hosted The Roe and Roeper Show with Roe Conn on WLS-AM. [4]
Richard Roeper (Chicago Sun-Times, At the Movies with Ebert & Roeper) Jonathan Rosenbaum (Chicago Reader) Jonathan Ross ; Dan Sallitt (The Los Angeles Reader, The Chicago Reader, The Village Voice, MUBI) Andrew Sarris (The Village Voice) Richard Schickel ; Paul Schrader (Film Comment) A. O. Scott (New York Times) Lisa Schwarzbaum (Entertainment ...
In September 2000, Chicago Sun-Times columnist Richard Roeper became the permanent co-host and the show was renamed At the Movies with Ebert & Roeper and later Ebert & Roeper. [5] [61] In 2000, Ebert interviewed President Bill Clinton about movies at The White House. [62] In 2002, Ebert was diagnosed with cancer of the salivary glands.
After Siskel died in 1999, [2] Ebert worked with various guest critics until choosing Chicago Sun-Times colleague Richard Roeper as his regular partner in 2000. [3] Ebert suspended his appearances in 2006 for treatment of thyroid cancer, with various guest hosts substituting for him.
[3] Metacritic, which uses a weighted average, assigned the film a score of 69 out of 100, based on 10 critics, indicating "generally favorable" reviews. [4] Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times gave the film three out of four stars and wrote, "Looking back all these years later, it's something of a miracle that, in the days before texts and ...
Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times called it "a quietly compelling film that shows how power of theater brings teens and parents together." [15] Matt Zoller Seitz of RogerEbert.com wrote that the film "tests your patience early but becomes powerful as it goes along... Some of the elements that might initially seem odd become the source of ...
A three out of four stars review from Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times stated, "There are some delightfully squeamish scenes — but this is primarily a psychological thriller, an update/variation on The Fall of the House of Usher." [14]
[12] On Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 72 out of 100, based on 6 critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews". [13] Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times rated the film 3.5 stars out of 4, praising the performances of Gerety, Brown and Shire - noting that "Gerety delivers a performance that is simply great. He plays ...