enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Kahler v. Kansas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahler_v._Kansas

    Kahler v. Kansas, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), is a case of the United States Supreme Court in which the justices ruled that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution do not require that states adopt the insanity defense in criminal cases that are based on the defendant's ability to recognize right from wrong.

  3. Trial of Daniel Sickles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Daniel_Sickles

    United States v. Sickles Court United States District Court for the District of Columbia Full case name United States of America v. Daniel E. Sickles Decided April 26, 1859 Verdict Not guilty Charge Murder of Philip Barton Key II Prosecution Robert Ould Defense James T. Brady, Edwin Stanton, John Graham The trial of Daniel Sickles was an American criminal trial. It was the first time that a ...

  4. Jones v. United States (1983) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jones_v._United_States_(1983)

    Jones v. United States, 463 U.S. 354 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court, for the first time, addressed whether the due process requirement of the Fourteenth Amendment allows defendants, who were found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) of a misdemeanor crime, to be involuntarily confined to a mental institution until such times as they are no longer a danger ...

  5. Insanity defense - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity_defense

    Kahler v. Kansas, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), is a case in which the US Supreme Court justices ruled that the Eighth and the Fourteenth Amendments of the US Constitution do not require states to adopt the insanity defense in criminal cases that are based on the defendant's ability to recognize right from wrong. [15] [16]

  6. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving mental ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Ultimately, Young instituted a federal habeas action. The court determined that the Community Protection Act was civil and, therefore, it could not violate the double jeopardy and ex post facto guarantees. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reasoned that the case turned on whether the Act was punitive "as applied" to Young. [5] 5th

  7. Clark v. Arizona - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clark_v._Arizona

    Clark v. Arizona, 548 U.S. 735 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the constitutionality of the insanity defense used by Arizona.. The Court affirmed the murder conviction of a man with paranoid schizophrenia for killing a police officer.

  8. Man who killed two people declared not guilty by reason of ...

    www.aol.com/man-killed-two-people-declared...

    A man who killed two people near Wichita Falls will not stand trial for capital murder after all, according to court documents. Instead, Daniel Eric Roof, 44, will go to a mental institution.

  9. Foucha v. Louisiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucha_v._Louisiana

    Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71 (1992), was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the court addressed the criteria for the continued commitment of an individual who had been found not guilty by reason of insanity.