enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 558

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 558 of the United States Reports: Case name ... Citizens United v. FEC: 558 U.S. 310: 2009:

  4. File:Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.pdf

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Citizens_United_v...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us

  5. 2011 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_term_per_curiam...

    The Supreme Court of the United States handed down fourteen per curiam opinions during its 2011 term, which began October 3, 2011 and concluded September 30, 2012. [1] Because per curiam decisions are issued from the Court as an institution, these opinions all lack the attribution of authorship or joining votes to specific justices. All ...

  6. Column: Exploring the origins of Supreme Court's Citizens ...

    www.aol.com/column-exploring-origins-supreme...

    Columnist argues Citizens United was based on a headnote on an 1886 ruling, not the ruling itself. Skip to main content. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to ...

  7. Opinion: How the Supreme Court got things so wrong on Trump ...

    www.aol.com/opinion-supreme-court-just-made...

    The Supreme Court was united on the idea that Trump will remain on the ballot in Colorado and that the state cannot remove him off its ballot. But the justices were divided about how broadly the ...

  8. Opinion: The Supreme Court could correct Mitch McConnell’s ...

    www.aol.com/opinion-supreme-court-could-correct...

    The Supreme Court justices can do so by agreeing with the Colorado Supreme Court’s recent decision that found Trump engaged in an insurrection and was therefore “disqualified from holding the ...

  9. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Summers, the Supreme Court held that police officers executing a search warrant were allowed to detain people on the premises while they conducted the search. This case limits that to the "immediate vicinity" of the place being searched, so police searching a basement apartment couldn't search a man leaving from near the apartment in a car.